"Court Overturns E.P.A.'s Biofuel Mandate" New York Times

"A federal appeals court threw out a federal rule on renewable fuels on Friday, saying that a quota set by the Environmental Protection Agency for incorporating liquids made from woody crops and wastes into car and truck fuels was based on wishful thinking rather than realistic estimates of what could be achieved. "

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/26/business/energy-environment/court-overturns-epas-biofuels-mandate.html?_r=1&

"More Corn Ethanol Means More Harm to Consumers, the Environment" Environmental Working Group

http://www.ewg.org/release/more-corn-ethanol-means-more-harm-consumers-environment

More Corn Ethanol Means More Harm to Consumers, the Environment
CONTACT: Sara Sciammacco, 202-667-6982, ssciammacco@ewg.org,
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Jan. 16, 2013
WASHINGTON – The decision by a federal appeals court not to block the sale of gasoline containing 15 percent corn ethanol (known as E15) is a setback for consumers and the environment, says Environmental Working Group vice president for government affairs Scott Faber.
The U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C. on Tuesday rejected a request that it reconsider an earlier decision that allowed the Environmental Protection Agency to go forward with regulations that permit the sale of the higher corn ethanol blend. Several food, oil, livestock and engine trade groups filed suit to challenge the EPA decision.
EWG’s Faber said in a statement:
“The court’s decision doesn’t change the simple fact that consumers will not buy a fuel that harms their engines, voids their warranties and jeopardizes their safety. And after a drought-ridden year that saw corn prices reach record highs, diverting even more of our crop to ethanol makes no sense whatsoever.
“Widespread use of E15 equates to higher grocery bills for struggling families, higher repair costs for motorists, higher spending for taxpayers and higher unemployment for livestock producers and farmers. That’s not the kind of energy future Americans can get behind. Instead, we need a commonsense approach to biofuels policy that loosens the corn ethanol industry’s stranglehold on the market and allows cleaner, more sustainable fuels to compete.”

As Biofuels Demand Grows, So Do Guatemala's Hunger Pangs New York Times

"Recent laws in the United States and Europe that mandate the increasing use of biofuel in cars have had far-flung ripple effects, economists say, as land once devoted to growing food for humans is now sometimes more profitably used for churning out vehicle fuel. "

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/06/science/earth/in-fields-and-markets-guatemalans-feel-squeeze-of-biofuel-demand.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Perdue trying to build soy biofuels plant in Pennsylvania

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRiA_2KySLM

Taking action against harmful biofuels policies | ActionAid

Taking action against harmful biofuels policies | ActionAid

"EPA rejects suspension of corn-based ethanol mandate" Christian Science Monitor

"Although about two dozen academics and scientists had testified for the waiver, it was opposed by the National Corn Growers Association.

Corn prices have quadrupled since 2005 as ethanol production has soared in response to the mandate. The trade group pointed out that the income of corn growers nationally had risen almost 50 percent since 2007, when the law took effect.

"http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/In-Gear/2012/1121/EPA-rejects-suspension-of-corn-based-ethanol-mandate

"Congress should permanently waive the ethanol mandate" Heritage.org

"... Environmentalist groups that once supported the use of ethanol are now arguing that once accounting for land use conversion, the use of fertilizers, insecticides, and pesticides, as well as the fossil fuels used for production and distribution, biofuel production has had unforeseen environmental consequences.
World hunger organizations have been especially critical of the mandate, arguing that diverting food to fuel increases corn prices. Corn is a staple product for many developing countries and is feed for livestock, so price spikes can have dramatically rippling effects."


http://blog.heritage.org/2012/11/19/congress-should-permanently-waive-the-ethanol-mandate/